George Orwell on falsification of fact (1946)

& (verbiage overflow)Sun 29 September 2013RSS

George Orwell (1903–50):

Freedom of the intellect means the freedom to report what one has seen, heard, and felt, and not to be obliged to fabricate imaginary facts and feelings. … The argument that to tell the truth would be ‘inopportune’ or would ‘play into the hands of’ somebody or other is felt to be unanswerable, and few people are bothered by the prospect of the lies which they condone getting out of the newspapers and into the history books. … The organized lying practiced by totalitarian states is not, as is sometimes claimed, a temporary expedient of the same nature as military deception. It is something integral to totalitarianism. … It is pointed out that all historical records are biased and inaccurate, or on the other hand, that modern physics has proven that what seems to us the real world is an illusion, so that to believe in the evidence of one’s senses is simply vulgar philistinism. … Already there are countless people who would think it scandalous to falsify a scientific textbook, but would see nothing wrong in falsifying an historical fact.

George Orwell, “The Prevention of Literature,” Polemic (London), No. 2 (1946). Found on line at http://orwell.ru/library/essays/prevention/english/e_plit (accessed 20130929).

[end]

Comments are enabled.



All prior articles

  1. George Orwell against uniformity of political principles (1946)
  2. George Orwell on keeping a diary to cultivate dispassionate thinking